Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Atharv's avatar

When you first told this story to me, it made me sick. It still does, a bit, but the motif you have added to it helps. I love how the drowsiness of sitting in class seems to fade back into 6th grade (clearly inspired by reality) and the whole MDP bit (I knew you'd write about it when you first told me about the prof saying this in class). The voice you have adopted here fits perfectly with a student trying his utmost to not sleep in class, only to give in at the end, and there's a strangeness to it that I cannot place, which makes the piece so good. Reading all of this feels like a surreal version of Wallflower coupled with better writing and stronger motifs. I don't really know what else to say here, because I hate this story as much as I love your writing. Well done, great job and for the love of all your grades, stop sleeping in class (it is also an honor to be surrounded by so many good writers nowadays).

Expand full comment
sadim's avatar

this is going to be a huge rant, so, maybe please bear with me like always. there are so many, too many layers in this, that when I first read it, it felt overwhelmingly raw and literally made me sick to my heart. like all your other pieces, it started with this nonchalant dude trying to recollect one his days but what's a great inculcated element was this drowsiness. i know you have douched this story with greek mythology references, and i cannot help but think of this drowsiness as related to Bacchus. you know, that effeminate being who first appeared in a ship and the sailors there made explicit comments on their preferred sexual transgression, almost mirroring your bullies. this almost felt like a dramatic irony that eventually sets the entire theme of this piece alive.

i kept eventually pondering on why the professor particularly called panda. like, why panda of all? they are the cuddliest, stupidest and adorably dumb animals to ever exist in the wild (im hesitant to use to word naive), then i tried to reason out that maybe it has to do with the fact that there was this huge bay of ignorance that separates the students and the teachers in the post modern word ("classroom represents an atom, mostly empty"). there were continuous mentions of how "detached" they were from everything, disinfectant classrooms, professor condemning insomnia, making a light comment on how death is preferred over pursuing greatest academic honourific: how the only way to know to escape this "indifferent horizon" is to be particularly agreeable to death and decay.

the next is the depiction of nostalgia. unlike what's commonly believed, nostalgia is presented as an "insurance", a compensation, like a deliberate ghost that is bound to come and haunt. this nostalgia isn't just sitting back and reminiscing the days, it comes with this sharp clarity that reveals the truth: truth as something that can only be attained after "introspection." hence, this nostalgia is only derived not just through retrospective ease but through thorough cross-examination of self. and it is through this "inspection" that one comes to this conclusion that childhood was a site of decay and death, like something "euthanised," while adulthood is a destination of clarity, precision and sincerity.

to me, this entire piece is a memoir on identity. all (children) characters seem to exhibit their sense of self through outward sources, as children should: learning through imitation. this is also where the narrator is set apart from the rest. while characters like Manav, who learnt drinking because his father drinks ("cheap bottles of liquor"), Maaz is aggressive because his father is (hinted), Gauransh's calmness or passiveness can be a mirror to his namesake (Gauri). the narrator (meticulously unnamed) is seen to filter out the bad through introspection, and it is through this filter that he learns to gain his consciousness or sense of morality. growing up, to the narrator is like a practice, a performance of precise use of logic, exercising atheism to counter helplessness: something he goes on to conclude is "a chore," and it is through the display of valour, or outright brattiness that one over comes it (think of the enamel and maaz's quick retort to his teacher).

an individual is not independent of his moral standpoint, which almost ALWAYS is influenced by his surroundings. similarly, the narrator's morales shift with his company. with maaz, all the bullies that was pertained to be showered over Gaurnash was laughed at, "until you think too hard of it." being a child, clarity was not on his side (understandably so), and so his morale is determined by his superior (maaz).

it is not until the very end that the narrator reaches the brink of his mind and realises the true binary of the situation. that is the moment of revelation where circumstances do not outweigh morality. in that moment, sisyphus wins.

okay, i feel like this is already long enough. i loved every bit of it and as atharv said, as much i hate this story, i love your writing. keep writing, genius.

Expand full comment
27 more comments...

No posts